| ThermalBoard versus Cement/Gypsum |
 |
- ThermalBoard's thin profile makes it excellent for retrofits.
- Thermalboard is excellent for small projects, whereas gypsum and cement are impractical and expensive in the same circumstances.
- Many jobs are lost due to resistance to pouring slabs or thin slabs that would not be lost with ThermalBoard.
- ThermalBoard can be installed in cold weather without fear of freezing.
- Double plating adds about 18 cents a square foot to the cost of a home and is needed with thin slab pours.
- Many jobs are lost to perception of slow response time of cement systems. Thermalboard accelerates rapidly and is appropriate for control with a simple setback thermostats or can be remotely controlled for weekend use.
- Scheduling of ThermalBoard can be more closely controlled, no trucks to wait for!
Top |
| ThermalBoard versus Warmboard |
 |
- ThermalBoard can go in later in a project, thus reducing time that piping is exposed to damage.
- ThermalBoard is more cost effective.
- Pipe is not run under walls with ThermalBoard.
- ThermalBoard is easily utilized in retrofits.
- ThermalBoard is easier to cut and custom routing is easier than with Warmboard.
Top |
ThermalBoard Information and Documentation
 Note: Some of the links below are to '.pdf' files. This is a file format created by Adobe for presenting graphic and design intensive documents across the Internet. These files can be very large, and slow to download if you do not have a fast Internet connection. If you have a slow connection, and would like to receive a copy of our print or CD catalog, please call us at 1 800-786-6847. If you would like to get the Acrobat Reader application or plug-in (which will allow you to view .pdf files using your browser), click here.
|
Line Card | Request A Catalog | Who To Talk To | Commercial Dept.
What's New | Employment | Join Our Email List | Help
Please contact info@jtgmuir.com with comments, questions, or corrections.
|
